RYZEN 5 3600 BENCHMARK PASSMARK PRO

Granted a 5% increase is pretty small for a 20% boost in memory frequency, but still thatРІР‚в„ўs more that what we saw in Cinebench. Moving over to 7-zip and here weРІР‚в„ўre looking at a 5% performance boost for the 10400 when using the faster spec memory. Rywas ~13% faster here and the 10400 comes in behind even the Ryzen 3 3100. When it comes to single core performance, we see that at least in Cinebench the memory speed doesnРІР‚в„ўt play much of a role. too bad that part is no longer as inexpensive as used to, but still good for around $110. Moreover, it was 14% faster than the RyAF. With just shy of 3200 points, the 10400 was 15% slower than the Ryand that doesnРІР‚в„ўt bode well for the Intel processors application performance. With that said, weРІР‚в„ўve picked key application and game benchmarks to look at, so here we go.Р”В¬inebench R20 multi-core goes first and right off the bat we see that memory speed doesnРІР‚в„ўt impact these rendering workloads as the Core i5-10400 produces basically the same result using either DDR4-3200 or 2666 memory. Our test suite has been shortened on this review compared to the last few, having spent the last week looking at in-depth testing for the 10900K, 10700K and 10600K, we simply donРІР‚в„ўt think the 10400 warrants us going over 30+ tests and you should be able to draw the same kind of conclusions regardless.

RYZEN 5 3600 BENCHMARK PASSMARK PRO

All configs were tested with a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, 32GB of DDR4-3200 CL14 memory and a Corsair Hydro H150i Pro 360mm AIO liquid cooler.Р”Р„s noted earlier, the Core i5-10400 was tested with both DDR4-3200 and DDR4-2666 memory, using the same CL14 timings. The Ryzen processors were tested on the Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master, 8th and 9th-gen Core processors were tested on the Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra and the new 10th-gen Intel processors on the Asus ROG Maximus XII Extreme. It appears as though IntelРІР‚в„ўs already on the back foot against a tough rival, but we should probably take a look at the benchmark results before drawing any conclusions. So when it comes to pricing AMD is asking about the same kind of money for their base model 6-core, 12-thread processor, which does not have integrated graphics but comes unlocked and supports memory overclocking on all motherboards. Those prices may adjust in the coming weeks based on demand and how users perceive the 10400 to perform against the Rywhich is usually sold around $175. There's also the 10400F variant of this chip that lacks integrated graphics for $157. Intel's suggested tray price for this chip is $182. Since this is a locked part, we'll include a DDR4-2666 memory configuration as that is the maximum memory speed youРІР‚в„ўll get access to B and H-series motherboards. That being the case, the typical out of the both experience won't be power limited and therefore we'll be testing the Core i5-10400 on a Z490 board with no TDP restrictions in place. We've had access to several new Z490 boards and only Asus seems to adhere to these limits with MSI, Asrock and Gigabyte all running without power limits with only one or two exceptions on mATX and Mini-ITX boards. However, the vast majority of Z490 motherboards donРІР‚в„ўt enforce the TDP limits. The reason the base clock is so low relative to the i5-10600K is that the TDP rating has dropped from 125 watts down to just 65 watts. IntelРІР‚в„ўs new Core i5-10400 is a locked 6-core, 12-thread processor that operates at between 2.9 GHz and 4.3 GHz depending on the workload.

Ryzen 5 3600 benchmark passmark